ENCOD
  • News
  • Our Mission
    • About
    • Our Team
    • ENCOD MEMBERS
    • INFO FOR MEMBERS
    • IN THE PRESS
    • FAQ
  • Actions & Events
    • CAMPAIGNS
      • FREEDOM TO FARM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM IS THE FIRST TEST OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM AND CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUBS FOR PEOPLE WHO USE CANNABIS AS A MEDICINE
        • FREEDOM TO FARM POSTERS
        • FREEDOM TO FARM STICKERS
      • Cannabis Social Clubs
        • EXAMPLES OF CSC’S IN EUROPE
        • Cannabis Social Clubs in Aktion
        • HOW TO CREATE A CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUB
        • PROPOSAL TO REGULATE THE SELF CULTIVATION AND CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUBS IN BELGIUM
        • Catalonia regulates the Cannabis Social Clubs
        • WORKSHOP ‘HOW TO SET UP A CSC IN GERMANY’
      • 2017
      • 2014
      • 2010 – 2013
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 1995 – 2005
      • EU LOBBY CAMPAIGN
        • 2011
        • 2010
        • 2009
        • 2008
        • 2007
        • 2006
        • 2005
        • 2004
    • AGENDA
    • EVENTS
    • ACTION APPEALS
  • Organisation
    • The Executive Committee
      • WORKING GROUPS
      • STUDIES
      • GENERAL ASSEMBLIES
      • FINANCES
    • ANNUAL REPORTS
  • Bulletins
  • Films & Videos
  • enEnglish
  • News
  • Our Mission
    • About
    • Our Team
    • ENCOD MEMBERS
    • INFO FOR MEMBERS
    • IN THE PRESS
    • FAQ
  • Actions & Events
    • CAMPAIGNS
      • FREEDOM TO FARM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM IS THE FIRST TEST OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
        • FREEDOM TO FARM AND CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUBS FOR PEOPLE WHO USE CANNABIS AS A MEDICINE
        • FREEDOM TO FARM POSTERS
        • FREEDOM TO FARM STICKERS
      • Cannabis Social Clubs
        • EXAMPLES OF CSC’S IN EUROPE
        • Cannabis Social Clubs in Aktion
        • HOW TO CREATE A CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUB
        • PROPOSAL TO REGULATE THE SELF CULTIVATION AND CANNABIS SOCIAL CLUBS IN BELGIUM
        • Catalonia regulates the Cannabis Social Clubs
        • WORKSHOP ‘HOW TO SET UP A CSC IN GERMANY’
      • 2017
      • 2014
      • 2010 – 2013
      • 2009
      • 2008
      • 2007
      • 2006
      • 1995 – 2005
      • EU LOBBY CAMPAIGN
        • 2011
        • 2010
        • 2009
        • 2008
        • 2007
        • 2006
        • 2005
        • 2004
    • AGENDA
    • EVENTS
    • ACTION APPEALS
  • Organisation
    • The Executive Committee
      • WORKING GROUPS
      • STUDIES
      • GENERAL ASSEMBLIES
      • FINANCES
    • ANNUAL REPORTS
  • Bulletins
  • Films & Videos
  • enEnglish
September 6, 2010  |  By ENCOD In 2010

BRITAIN’S DRUG POLICY WILL NOT IMPROVE UNTIL WE ARE BOLD ENOUGH TO EXPERIMENT

arton2632

Source: The Observer

5 September 2010

By Alex Stevens


We Can’t Know the Potential Benefits of Innovations Like Portugal’s Unless We Research Them, Says Alex Stevens

For years, the UK government has consistently used a myth to stave off any bold innovations in our failing drug policy. It has predicted that liberalisation would inevitably lead to higher rates of drug use and related harms. The example of Portugal seriously challenges this argument.

The idea that decriminalisation increases drug problems was already on shaky ground. Several countries and US states have reduced or eliminated criminal penalties for drug possession. They do not generally have higher rates of drug use than their neighbours. The rate of cannabis use in the Netherlands, for example, is lower than in the UK, even though the Dutch decriminalised the use of cannabis in 1976. The Portuguese experience again shows that there is no necessary link between the severity of sanctions and rates of drug use. There have been some increases reported in drug use by Portuguese adults since 2001, but these are no greater than those seen in other southern European countries. More important are rates of drug use among children, as they are more vulnerable to the harmful effects of illicit drugs. In Portugal, these rates have fallen since decriminalisation.

As fewer people were arrested for drug offences, the prison population fell. So did drug use and HIV among prisoners.

Portugal has also expanded its treatment programmes, including the use of prescribed methadone. This would have reduced deaths and infections even without decriminalisation, as it has elsewhere.

There are limits to the ability of decriminalisation to deal with harm related to illicit drug markets. The policy has not cleared the dealers off the cobbled streets of Lisbon’s Bairro Alto. It cannot eliminate the violence related to the unregulated economy of drug supply. Since decriminalisation, Portugal’s murder rate has increased, but it is not known how much of this is linked to the drugs trade. The answer could be to take the business out of the hands of violent criminals by handing it to tightly regulated legal organisations, as has been suggested by the Transform Drug Policy Foundation and others.

The potential benefits and costs of drug policy innovations will remain incalculable as long as governments refuse to implement and research them. The Portuguese began their apparently beneficial policy only after commissioning research from respected academics. In the UK last autumn, we saw the removal of the government’s leading scientific adviser, Professor David Nutt, for daring to tell the truth about its policies on cannabis and ecstasy. Labour and the Conservatives colluded in this denial of the evidence. They are now conspiring to block the creation of more effective, evidence-based policies on alcohol. They have argued against the introduction of a minimum unit price in Scotland on the basis that it is experimental. But without experimentation, how can we create more effective policies?

Politicians usually only suggest decriminalisation when they are either on the verge of retirement or at the fringes of power. As a young MP, David Cameron himself acknowledged the failures of current policies. He supported fresh thinking on liberalisation, heroin prescription and drug consumption rooms. The Portuguese example suggests he should have the courage of his earlier convictions, now that he is in a position to enact them.

Alex Stevens is professor of criminal justice at the University of Kent and the author of Drugs, Crime and Public Health (Routledge, 2011)

Creative Commons License AttributionRepublish
Previous StoryTHE BIGGEST FREE HEMP MARCH EVER, IN POLAND
Next StoryCAN PSYCHEDELIC DRUGS TREAT DEPRESSION?

Related Articles

  • arton2793
    CANNABIS CLUBS PLUG A GAP IN SPANISH DRUG LAWS
  • arton2784
    THE CONCEPT OF DRUG HARMS

Recent posts

  • ENCOD General Assembly 2018 Press Release
  • Survey: European Civil Society on Drugs Report (ENCOD)
  • ENCOD General Assembly 2018
  • Welcome to the new ENCOD website!
  • ENCOD Bulletin 147: Thoughts for societies that use drugs.

Recent Comments

  • encod on A response to Bushka Bryndova’s letter to president Putin
  • encod on A response to Bushka Bryndova’s letter to president Putin
  • cureall on THE BEST WAY TO PRODUCE CANNABIS OIL
  • Michelle on 700 MEDICINAL USES OF CANNABIS SORTED BY DISEASE
  • encod on The demons in drug law reform: A critical look at regulation and stigma

Categories

Archives

Encod Gold Member

Sensi Seeds

Copyright ©2018 ENCOD. All Rights Reserved

  • enEnglish
×

REPUBLISHING TERMS

You may republish this article online or in print under our Creative Commons license.
You may not edit or shorten the text and you must attribute the article to ENCOD (www.encod.org) plus you must include the author’s name in your republication.

If you have any questions, please email [email protected]

License

Creative Commons License AttributionCreative Commons Attribution
BRITAIN’S DRUG POLICY WILL NOT IMPROVE UNTIL WE ARE BOLD ENOUGH TO EXPERIMENT